| 1 |
W dniu czw, 14.09.2017 o godzinie 23∶45 -0700, użytkownik Daniel |
| 2 |
Campbell napisał: |
| 3 |
> On 09/14/2017 11:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 4 |
> > W dniu czw, 14.09.2017 o godzinie 14∶58 -0700, użytkownik Daniel |
| 5 |
> > Campbell napisał: |
| 6 |
> > > If I had to find a nitpick, it's a minor feature request: can we get a |
| 7 |
> > > GLEP template file later on, to aid the initial drafting process? I |
| 8 |
> > > didn't see it in the repo. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > I see your point. I always took some random late GLEP and wiped out |
| 11 |
> > the contents. Maybe having a skel file with just the headings and empty |
| 12 |
> > headers wouldn't be such a bad idea after all. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > I'm wondering if it belongs in the GLEP repo though. Maybe just |
| 15 |
> > skel.rst? (given that www globs on glep-[0-9]...) |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> skel.rst would work I think; any file name that didn't disrupt |
| 19 |
> automation would be good enough, though. No real preference. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
OTOH, I think we'll start by adding it to gentoo syntax packages for our |
| 23 |
editors, so e.g. typing: |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
$ vim glep-0100.rst |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
you'd get the skel in place. I guess we'll see how good coverage that |
| 28 |
has, and then decide if we need another skel in the repo. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Best regards, |
| 32 |
Michał Górny |
Archives