| 1 |
On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > On the face of it, I like this proposal. On the other hand, wouldn't it |
| 4 |
> be |
| 5 |
> > better if we just had more active list moderators? That is, moderators |
| 6 |
> who |
| 7 |
> > move problematic user's posts to moderated by default, and then withhold |
| 8 |
> > the specific posts if necessary? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I don't think this is really technically feasible. I don't know if mlmmj |
| 11 |
> has the specific feature you're asking for, and even if it did, |
| 12 |
> moderation with mlmmj is practically impossible to use. Even for low- |
| 13 |
> traffic channel like gentoo-dev-announce@ it's not working well. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Maybe we should move to a more modern list manager? I'm pretty sure mailman |
| 17 |
can do this kind of stuff trivially. It feels bad if we have to institute |
| 18 |
suboptimal processes due to crappy tooling, if better alternatives are |
| 19 |
readily available. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Regards, |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Dirkjan |
Archives