| 1 |
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:16:48AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > TL;DR: move comrel, infra, PR to Foundation. Have strict(er) application |
| 5 |
>> > of policies to them in line with their powers. |
| 6 |
>> 1. I don't think we ought to be giving more power to the Foundation |
| 7 |
>> until the Foundation membership is re-aligned with the distro |
| 8 |
>> developer membership. We essentially have two democratic |
| 9 |
>> organizations with overlapping but different constituencies, and I'm |
| 10 |
>> not sure Gentoo could survive if they start trying to pull the distro |
| 11 |
>> in different directions since the community seems like it is barely |
| 12 |
>> above critical mass as it is. |
| 13 |
> Should we amend the bylaws such that all active developers are |
| 14 |
> automatically members of the Foundation, without specifically applying? |
| 15 |
> Thereafter, on developer retirement, failing to cast a vote in two |
| 16 |
> consecutive elections will end their membership. |
| 17 |
> Non-developers can still apply as before. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I think we should amend it, but I suggest before starting that we |
| 20 |
finish figuring out what we want the final picture to look like. |
| 21 |
Amending the bylaws is the means, not the end. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I think that retired devs should be immediately removed. Activity |
| 24 |
should be more than just voting. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Rich |
Archives