| 1 |
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> That said I think the principle of avoiding a conflict of interest is still |
| 4 |
> a meritorious one. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Avoiding conflicts of interest is an absolute necessity. However, I |
| 7 |
still dispute that overlapping membership between Comrel, Proctors, |
| 8 |
Council, Trustees, etc is a conflict of interest. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Now, somebody voting on a case where they are a party would be a |
| 11 |
conflict of interest. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
A conflict of interest exists when somebody can make a decision that |
| 14 |
is bad for Gentoo, but good for them personally. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
As I mentioned, I believe this is a minority opinion around here. |
| 17 |
That's ok, even if you're all wrong I can still follow the policy, and |
| 18 |
it is a bit moot in my case since I'm not in Comrel... :) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Rich |
Archives