1 |
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com> |
3 |
> wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> That said I think the principle of avoiding a conflict of interest |
6 |
>> is still |
7 |
>> a meritorious one. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Avoiding conflicts of interest is an absolute necessity. However, I |
10 |
> still dispute that overlapping membership between Comrel, Proctors, |
11 |
> Council, Trustees, etc is a conflict of interest. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Now, somebody voting on a case where they are a party would be a |
14 |
> conflict of interest. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> A conflict of interest exists when somebody can make a decision that |
17 |
> is bad for Gentoo, but good for them personally. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> As I mentioned, I believe this is a minority opinion around here. |
20 |
> That's ok, even if you're all wrong I can still follow the policy, and |
21 |
> it is a bit moot in my case since I'm not in Comrel... :) |
22 |
|
23 |
https://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=Project:Council/Code_of_conduct&oldid=53283 |
24 |
|
25 |
I found this. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
> -- |
29 |
> Rich |
30 |
> |