Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Trying to become a Gentoo Developer again spanning 8 years...
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 01:53:27
Message-Id: 1475805201.29581.4@smtp.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Trying to become a Gentoo Developer again spanning 8 years... by Rich Freeman
1 On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com>
3 > wrote:
4 >>
5 >> That said I think the principle of avoiding a conflict of interest
6 >> is still
7 >> a meritorious one.
8 >
9 > Avoiding conflicts of interest is an absolute necessity. However, I
10 > still dispute that overlapping membership between Comrel, Proctors,
11 > Council, Trustees, etc is a conflict of interest.
12 >
13 > Now, somebody voting on a case where they are a party would be a
14 > conflict of interest.
15 >
16 > A conflict of interest exists when somebody can make a decision that
17 > is bad for Gentoo, but good for them personally.
18 >
19 > As I mentioned, I believe this is a minority opinion around here.
20 > That's ok, even if you're all wrong I can still follow the policy, and
21 > it is a bit moot in my case since I'm not in Comrel... :)
22
23 https://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=Project:Council/Code_of_conduct&oldid=53283
24
25 I found this.
26 >
27 >
28 > --
29 > Rich
30 >

Replies