1 |
On 10/06/2016 08:53 PM, Raymond Jennings wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com> |
4 |
>> wrote: |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> That said I think the principle of avoiding a conflict of interest |
7 |
>>> is still |
8 |
>>> a meritorious one. |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> Avoiding conflicts of interest is an absolute necessity. However, I |
11 |
>> still dispute that overlapping membership between Comrel, Proctors, |
12 |
>> Council, Trustees, etc is a conflict of interest. |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> Now, somebody voting on a case where they are a party would be a |
15 |
>> conflict of interest. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> A conflict of interest exists when somebody can make a decision that |
18 |
>> is bad for Gentoo, but good for them personally. |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> As I mentioned, I believe this is a minority opinion around here. |
21 |
>> That's ok, even if you're all wrong I can still follow the policy, and |
22 |
>> it is a bit moot in my case since I'm not in Comrel... :) |
23 |
> |
24 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?title=Project:Council/Code_of_conduct&oldid=53283 |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I found this. |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> |
30 |
>> -- |
31 |
>> Rich |
32 |
>> |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
iirc there is a policy of no crossover between trustees and council. |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |