| 1 |
> |
| 2 |
> Attached is a patch for glep 39 which will make this change. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Thoughts? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
William, |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
the actions of all projects can be appealed with the council. So this doesnt |
| 10 |
make too much sense, unless you want council members to be temporarily retired |
| 11 |
from Gentoo. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
This is precisely why we have the listing of candidates for the council |
| 14 |
elections, where comrel, qa, and infra members are clearly marked. If you |
| 15 |
don't want any overlap, don't vote for these candidates, as simple as that. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Something else though... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Do you really think that working on comrel issues is "fun" and that this is a |
| 20 |
much sought-after position? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Just about the only appeal of being comrel member that I could imagine is some |
| 23 |
diffuse feeling of power, but believe me that is very quickly offset by the |
| 24 |
xxxx you have to digest. (Of course one could try to just join the team and |
| 25 |
not do anything, but that's not what I am talking about.) Also it's a bit like |
| 26 |
described in the Hitchhiker's guide, everyone who really really wants to do it |
| 27 |
is essentially unsuited for the job. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Food for thought... |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I'm against this change to GLEP39, and challenge everyone who doesn't want me |
| 32 |
on the council to not vote for me in the next election. Cheers! |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Andreas |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 38 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 39 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 40 |
(council, toolchain, perl, libreoffice, comrel) |
Archives