1 |
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 22:30 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 22:27:53 +0100 |
3 |
> Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > The council have met monthly as required by the GLEP. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Nope. The GLEP requires that there's at least one open meeting per |
7 |
> month. It also, as a separate requirement, forces a reelection whenever |
8 |
> a meeting has less than 50% attendance. |
9 |
|
10 |
I think the GLEP is a little harsh there. It likely should be amended or |
11 |
revised. To allow them the opportunity to re-schedule the meeting. Make |
12 |
up for their mistake. Rather than rush straight to punishment. |
13 |
|
14 |
We all make mistakes, and I think so far they have done a good job and |
15 |
earned a little leeway. But I am in no way shape or form, advocating we |
16 |
not follow our own policies. But at the same time, we must use common |
17 |
sense. |
18 |
|
19 |
I think the GLEP is a good start, with some revisions it can be even |
20 |
better :) |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
24 |
amd64/Java/Trustees |
25 |
Gentoo Foundation |