| 1 |
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 10:42 AM Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> If Trustees can fill the vacancies, then there's no point in omitting |
| 4 |
> _reopen_nominations. They could still pick any candidates from below. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> So, I think the procedure as announced by antarus makes sense. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
If the election itself fails to actually elect anybody, they can |
| 9 |
actually appoint anybody they wish I believe. (ie, if the reopen |
| 10 |
option wins they could just appoint drobbins or a cousin or whatever, |
| 11 |
though obviously it would make more sense to just appoint somebody on |
| 12 |
the ballot, preferably the one with the most votes.) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
They actually can do that right now without another election, though I |
| 15 |
do think the course they're taking is a sensible one. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
We could spend a lot of time debating the ideal election process, but |
| 18 |
in the end if you have only three volunteers for three slots, it is a |
| 19 |
bit of a moot argument... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Rich |
Archives