Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-project <gentoo-project@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Fw: Your temporary 2 week suspension on interacting on the Gentoo Github page
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 19:09:50
Message-Id: CAGfcS_=H8xeHGgxqW7PC3778Mc_+91ayMHfuBZ2EtKkN1ZpiHw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Fw: Your temporary 2 week suspension on interacting on the Gentoo Github page by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
2 <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
3 > On Tue, 16 May 2017 11:19:17 -0700
4 > James Ausmus <james.ausmus@×××××.com> wrote:
5 >> > This is one of those situations where talking about a problem
6 >> > becomes a problem...
7 >>
8 >> While I certainly understand what you're saying, I think this is a
9 >> slippery slope - "Don't talk about our problems, people will notice,
10 >> we need to pretend to be perfect!" leads to actual problems
11 >> festering, going unresolved, and becoming much larger than they
12 >> should be. It's also *very* much not in the spirit of Open Source.
13 >
14 > It's also against the Social Contract.
15 >
16
17 Note that I never said that people shouldn't be allowed to talk about
18 problems. I merely said that doing so in this case is probably
19 contrary to their own interests.
20
21 And I'm talking about these nebulous "not enough people are working on
22 the stuff I want them to work on for free" problems. If nobody is
23 fixing a bug it is because nobody cares enough to fix it. There
24 probably isn't a single pull request in github that wouldn't be fixed
25 in 30 seconds if some user offered a million dollar bounty for it.
26 I'm not saying that anybody has a duty to do this. Rather, we're all
27 getting what we collectively pay for, or contribute to.
28
29 --
30 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Fw: Your temporary 2 week suspension on interacting on the Gentoo Github page "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>