1 |
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Ciaran McCreesh |
2 |
<ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> On Tue, 16 May 2017 11:19:17 -0700 |
4 |
> James Ausmus <james.ausmus@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
>> > This is one of those situations where talking about a problem |
6 |
>> > becomes a problem... |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> While I certainly understand what you're saying, I think this is a |
9 |
>> slippery slope - "Don't talk about our problems, people will notice, |
10 |
>> we need to pretend to be perfect!" leads to actual problems |
11 |
>> festering, going unresolved, and becoming much larger than they |
12 |
>> should be. It's also *very* much not in the spirit of Open Source. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> It's also against the Social Contract. |
15 |
> |
16 |
|
17 |
Note that I never said that people shouldn't be allowed to talk about |
18 |
problems. I merely said that doing so in this case is probably |
19 |
contrary to their own interests. |
20 |
|
21 |
And I'm talking about these nebulous "not enough people are working on |
22 |
the stuff I want them to work on for free" problems. If nobody is |
23 |
fixing a bug it is because nobody cares enough to fix it. There |
24 |
probably isn't a single pull request in github that wouldn't be fixed |
25 |
in 30 seconds if some user offered a million dollar bounty for it. |
26 |
I'm not saying that anybody has a duty to do this. Rather, we're all |
27 |
getting what we collectively pay for, or contribute to. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Rich |