| 1 |
On nie, 2017-07-30 at 08:35 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ühel kenal päeval, L, 29.07.2017 kell 15:35, kirjutas Andreas K. |
| 3 |
> Huettel: |
| 4 |
> > Am Freitag, 28. Juli 2017, 23:36:04 CEST schrieb Michał Górny: |
| 5 |
> > > Hi, |
| 6 |
> > > |
| 7 |
> > > When looking through projects with no members, I've noticed that we |
| 8 |
> > > have |
| 9 |
> > > a project called 'Programming' [1], aliased to lang-misc@g.o. It |
| 10 |
> > > doesn't |
| 11 |
> > > seem to be touched since being migrated from the old site, and it |
| 12 |
> > > houses |
| 13 |
> > > three subprojects: Ada, Haskell and Ruby. The mail alias points to |
| 14 |
> > > /dev/null (literally). |
| 15 |
> > > |
| 16 |
> > > Do you think anything of value in this project? Or can I just |
| 17 |
> > > disband |
| 18 |
> > > it, and move the subprojects to top scope? |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > Well some lenghty time ago I proposed (as member of the |
| 21 |
> > "Metastructure |
| 22 |
> > project", yay!) to move all programming languages under that umbrella |
| 23 |
> > - mostly |
| 24 |
> > to clean up our organizational graph. Nobody was really happy about |
| 25 |
> > that idea. |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> > So yes, either use it consistently or disband it. Current state makes |
| 28 |
> > no |
| 29 |
> > sense. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Given we have really no other way of grouping of projects, I meanwhile |
| 32 |
> support the idea of near-empty projects housing other subprojects. E.g |
| 33 |
> desktop that was disbanded on even more questionable circumstances. |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Or maybe the wiki people could whip something up to categorize and |
| 36 |
> group things? |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
To what purpose, exactly? |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
Best regards, |
| 43 |
Michał Górny |
Archives