1 |
Ühel kenal päeval, P, 30.07.2017 kell 07:43, kirjutas Michał Górny: |
2 |
> On nie, 2017-07-30 at 08:35 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: |
3 |
> > Ühel kenal päeval, L, 29.07.2017 kell 15:35, kirjutas Andreas K. |
4 |
> > Huettel: |
5 |
> > > Am Freitag, 28. Juli 2017, 23:36:04 CEST schrieb Michał Górny: |
6 |
> > > > Hi, |
7 |
> > > > |
8 |
> > > > When looking through projects with no members, I've noticed |
9 |
> > > > that we |
10 |
> > > > have |
11 |
> > > > a project called 'Programming' [1], aliased to lang-misc@g.o. |
12 |
> > > > It |
13 |
> > > > doesn't |
14 |
> > > > seem to be touched since being migrated from the old site, and |
15 |
> > > > it |
16 |
> > > > houses |
17 |
> > > > three subprojects: Ada, Haskell and Ruby. The mail alias points |
18 |
> > > > to |
19 |
> > > > /dev/null (literally). |
20 |
> > > > |
21 |
> > > > Do you think anything of value in this project? Or can I just |
22 |
> > > > disband |
23 |
> > > > it, and move the subprojects to top scope? |
24 |
> > > |
25 |
> > > Well some lenghty time ago I proposed (as member of the |
26 |
> > > "Metastructure |
27 |
> > > project", yay!) to move all programming languages under that |
28 |
> > > umbrella |
29 |
> > > - mostly |
30 |
> > > to clean up our organizational graph. Nobody was really happy |
31 |
> > > about |
32 |
> > > that idea. |
33 |
> > > |
34 |
> > > So yes, either use it consistently or disband it. Current state |
35 |
> > > makes |
36 |
> > > no |
37 |
> > > sense. |
38 |
> > |
39 |
> > Given we have really no other way of grouping of projects, I |
40 |
> > meanwhile |
41 |
> > support the idea of near-empty projects housing other subprojects. |
42 |
> > E.g |
43 |
> > desktop that was disbanded on even more questionable circumstances. |
44 |
> > |
45 |
> > Or maybe the wiki people could whip something up to categorize and |
46 |
> > group things? |
47 |
> > |
48 |
> |
49 |
> To what purpose, exactly? |
50 |
|
51 |
Users to find projects (e.g what desktop to use and see their |
52 |
respective project pages for gentoo specifics) in a saner way than |
53 |
cruising through a list of 100+ entries of everything and the kitchen |
54 |
sink. |
55 |
Or maybe even the projects themselves to know the similar ones to |
56 |
cooperate at times. |