1 |
Dnia 2015-02-15, o godz. 15:39:58 |
2 |
Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 10:55:41 +0100 Alexey Lapitsky wrote: |
5 |
> > Hi Mart, |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > I agree with every sentence from your email. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Rich made a great example about the rabbit hole. I don't think we |
10 |
> > should blindly follow the social contract. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > Just want to add that Github has pushed forward so many open source |
13 |
> > projects that we must ask ourselves a different question: |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > Is Gentoo willing to say "no" to the new users, developers and the |
16 |
> > speed of development just because Github is not FOSS? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Is Gentoo willing to say "no" to the software freedom and its own |
19 |
> social obligations in order to make contributions easier in the |
20 |
> simplest way possible? |
21 |
|
22 |
Please explain me, how *exactly* does allowing contributions via |
23 |
proprietary platform hurt free software? |
24 |
|
25 |
> What if github will change its policy at any random moment, e.g. |
26 |
> will kick projects or deny whole countries to contribute? What if |
27 |
> they will require payment for services at some time? |
28 |
|
29 |
Then users will simply stop using it. Simple as that. |
30 |
|
31 |
> Github itself is uncontrolled by Gentoo community, this rises |
32 |
> security concerns as well. |
33 |
|
34 |
Everything rises security concerns, and especially random stuff hosted |
35 |
by Gentoo Infra with no clear ToS, privacy policy and other basic |
36 |
documentation in place. |
37 |
|
38 |
Next thing I know, we should stop using third party mirrors because we |
39 |
have no control over them and users can end up relying on their mirror |
40 |
of choice reliably providing Gentoo files. And at the same time, |
41 |
a number of developers ignores the fact that SRC_URIs are no longer |
42 |
valid and files are only kept alive by random mirrors. |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
Best regards, |
46 |
Michał Górny |