1 |
Some things that I noticed when reading the draft: |
2 |
|
3 |
- GLEP 1 and 2 recommend licensing GLEPs under the Open Publication |
4 |
License. Is there any specific reason for this? If not, we should |
5 |
switch to CC-BY-SA, in order to be compatible with the license used |
6 |
for the wiki (and for the rest of our documentation). |
7 |
|
8 |
Only few GLEPs are actually licensed under the OPL, namely GLEP 12, |
9 |
GLEP 49, and GLEPs 57 to 61. Maybe their authors could be asked to |
10 |
relicense them under CC-BY-SA? |
11 |
|
12 |
- Section headings. The draft says to use these: |
13 |
=First-Level Title= |
14 |
==Second-Level Title== |
15 |
===Third-Level Title=== |
16 |
IIUC, in Mediawiki first-level headings are reserved for the page |
17 |
title, so this list should start with == ==. The markup of the GLEP |
18 |
draft itself suffers from this problem, too. |
19 |
|
20 |
- Minor formatting issues, like emphasis (*foo* instead of ''foo''). |
21 |
|
22 |
Ulrich |