| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 17/12/13 09:35, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 5 |
> - GLEP 1 and 2 recommend licensing GLEPs under the Open Publication |
| 6 |
> License. Is there any specific reason for this? If not, we should |
| 7 |
> switch to CC-BY-SA, in order to be compatible with the license used |
| 8 |
> for the wiki (and for the rest of our documentation). |
| 9 |
I have been contemplating opening a similar discussion in the future. |
| 10 |
Might as well do it now. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
We should change all GLEPs (or at least the ones that are public |
| 13 |
domain) to CC-BY-SA for two reasons. The first is compatibility, as |
| 14 |
you mention. The second is that public domain differs from country to |
| 15 |
country and is just needlessly complex when we can use CC-BY-SA instead. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
- -- |
| 18 |
Alexander |
| 19 |
alexander@××××××.net |
| 20 |
http://plaimi.net/~alexander |
| 21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) |
| 23 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlKwJRIACgkQRtClrXBQc7U9mwD/dXwMAkwiio5zpC1zxAWiW9y5 |
| 26 |
67AkKO2CvhEGg2TR/j4A/jbguy6xhdp1hFUqtuEI1KBV4C54YjQJdVOeqx26XGbG |
| 27 |
=piux |
| 28 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives