| 1 |
On 2019-06-15 11:49, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
| 2 |
> What is your opinion on this problem? |
| 3 |
> Should GLEP 76 be left as is? |
| 4 |
> Should GLEP 76 be cancelled? |
| 5 |
> Should GLEP 76 be improved and how? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I don't see GLEP 76 being cancelled. I personally do *not* share your |
| 8 |
privacy concerns and really believe that this was a necessary, long |
| 9 |
overdue, change. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
But my opinion doesn't matter. What I want to say: My opinion has the |
| 12 |
same value as your opinion or the opinion of any other developer. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
And from that POV, you have to acknowledge that nobody really raised |
| 15 |
such a concern. The truth is, only 1 active developer is really affected |
| 16 |
by this change (at least just one developer expressed problems and |
| 17 |
stopped contributing since then). But this wasn't a council-only |
| 18 |
decision. When this was discussed on mailing list, everyone should have |
| 19 |
known the consequences. In other words: Most people in Gentoo agreed |
| 20 |
that we have to address copyright and we don't do anything crazy in |
| 21 |
comparison to Fedora/Redhat, Arch Linux or Debian. Wrong? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
If you or anyone else have an idea how GLEP 76 could be improved please |
| 24 |
share! That's not special about GLEP 76, that's valid for anything in |
| 25 |
Gentoo. We all are Gentoo. And if there's a problem which could be |
| 26 |
solved or something which could be improved, raise your voice so we can |
| 27 |
become better -- together. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Regards, |
| 32 |
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 33 |
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 |
Archives