| 1 |
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 12:42:20 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi all! |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Last year we had a good initiative: it addition to (or even instead |
| 5 |
> of) manifests nominees were asked questions by voters. So let's |
| 6 |
> continue this year. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I propose to have one question per thread spawned by this e-mail to |
| 9 |
> keep discussion focused. If you have multiple questions, please |
| 10 |
> start multiple threads. If your question was already asked, please |
| 11 |
> join a thread. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I'll ask my questions in subsequent e-mails. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
In my opinion GLEP 76 is the most controversial decision made by |
| 16 |
running council. While it fixed some long standing issues like |
| 17 |
copyright headers and proper acknowledgement of out of the tree |
| 18 |
contributors, it created grave problems: now some long-time |
| 19 |
contributors and even developer are seriously discriminated because |
| 20 |
they want to keep their privacy. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
What is your opinion on this problem? |
| 23 |
Should GLEP 76 be left as is? |
| 24 |
Should GLEP 76 be cancelled? |
| 25 |
Should GLEP 76 be improved and how? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Best regards, |
| 28 |
Andrew Savchenko |
Archives