1 |
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 08:08:30 -0600 Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 10:43 AM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > I'd like to discuss a proposal aiming to improve the general quality of |
5 |
> > ebuilds in the Gentoo repository. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Is something actually broken? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> IMO discretion and ability to comply with policies/etc are probably |
11 |
> far more important than rattling off EAPI/eclass/GLEP trivia. They're |
12 |
> just hard to measure for new recruits so we use the quizzes as a proxy |
13 |
> for estimating whether somebody will be able to fit in. If somebody |
14 |
> could pass the quizzes in the past, and have a fairly clean record |
15 |
> inside Gentoo, then I don't really see the point in having them |
16 |
> continue to jump through hoops. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> If they're making mistakes in their commits then just focus on the |
19 |
> mistakes they're making and boot devs who don't raise their general |
20 |
> level of quality. You don't need to guess whether an existing dev |
21 |
> will mess up the repo - they already have commit access. If they |
22 |
> haven't been breaking things left and right so far, it is unlikely |
23 |
> that they will start to do so in the future. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Now, docs for developers about EAPI changes have been written in the |
26 |
> past and are undoubtedly useful. I just don't see the need to give |
27 |
> them a certification quiz of some sort. |
28 |
|
29 |
Rich, apparently this was a hapless 1st April's joke. |
30 |
|
31 |
Best regards, |
32 |
Andrew Savchenko |