Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] Ebuild quizzes for existing developers
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 14:23:20
Message-Id: 20190403172312.a69395f49be6968309383574@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] Ebuild quizzes for existing developers by Rich Freeman
1 On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 08:08:30 -0600 Rich Freeman wrote:
2 > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 10:43 AM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
3 > >
4 > > I'd like to discuss a proposal aiming to improve the general quality of
5 > > ebuilds in the Gentoo repository.
6 > >
7 >
8 > Is something actually broken?
9 >
10 > IMO discretion and ability to comply with policies/etc are probably
11 > far more important than rattling off EAPI/eclass/GLEP trivia. They're
12 > just hard to measure for new recruits so we use the quizzes as a proxy
13 > for estimating whether somebody will be able to fit in. If somebody
14 > could pass the quizzes in the past, and have a fairly clean record
15 > inside Gentoo, then I don't really see the point in having them
16 > continue to jump through hoops.
17 >
18 > If they're making mistakes in their commits then just focus on the
19 > mistakes they're making and boot devs who don't raise their general
20 > level of quality. You don't need to guess whether an existing dev
21 > will mess up the repo - they already have commit access. If they
22 > haven't been breaking things left and right so far, it is unlikely
23 > that they will start to do so in the future.
24 >
25 > Now, docs for developers about EAPI changes have been written in the
26 > past and are undoubtedly useful. I just don't see the need to give
27 > them a certification quiz of some sort.
28
29 Rich, apparently this was a hapless 1st April's joke.
30
31 Best regards,
32 Andrew Savchenko