Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-project <gentoo-project@l.g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting developer-oriented and expert user mailing lists
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 23:14:10
Message-Id: CAGfcS_=JFTsoQs5Qi8zfdU3bW6P4UhDOS2DMH5=PM-eq8+tzVg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting developer-oriented and expert user mailing lists by Kristian Fiskerstrand
1 On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> wrote:
2 > On 12/05/2017 11:41 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
3 >> On 12/05/2017 11:37 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
4 >>> Honestly, I'm not really a big fan of even on-topic posts from people
5 >>> who have caused a lot of harm to others in private. I'm not sure
6 >>> which is the lesser evil but do we really want a community where we
7 >>> tolerate absolutely any kind of abuse of other members?
8 >>
9 >> We do not, but that presumes actual abuse has been demonstrated.
10 >> "spamming the mailing list", where the posts are regarding Gentoo, isn't
11 >> automatically abuse because some people are uncomfortable about the
12 >> information being presented, or they disagree with it.
13 >>
14 >
15 > This whole email thread is actually one of the examples of where split
16 > lists is a bad thing, the original message was cross-posted between
17 > gentoo-project and gentoo-dev with a reply-to for gentoo-dev. Resulting
18 > in split discussions across the lists. The overall discussion should've
19 > been in -project to begin with.
20 >
21
22 Certainly, though if our lists actually were moderated it would be a
23 non-issue because all the replies to the off-topic list would have
24 been deleted.
25
26 Mailing lists aren't great for moderation in general though, because
27 it is impossible to delete a post after it has been distributed. In a
28 forum something like this would be easily solved by just moving the
29 thread to the right place, deleting posts after the fact, and so on.
30
31 --
32 Rich