1 |
On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 5:51:09 AM EDT Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> > It seems to me that William posted something that someone else didn't |
4 |
> > like. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> That seems like a pretty big assumption. How do you know that it has |
7 |
> something to do with something he posted? |
8 |
|
9 |
In 2008 it was about a post to a public list, and that is on the archives. A |
10 |
post was unruly, violated CoC. Led to a blind mailing list ban. I went around |
11 |
ban with 1 post. Days later Devrel wanted to suspend me for 15 days. I |
12 |
disagreed with the punishment, preventing development for 15 days. I left. I |
13 |
ave them their 15 days + 8 years. |
14 |
|
15 |
Most attempts to return did not get that bad just did not go anywhere. What |
16 |
happened in 2015 should not have occurred. Things have gotten much worse! |
17 |
|
18 |
> However, I think we should be far more concerned about outcome. Is |
19 |
> somebody willing to follow the CoC, or not? Are they able to follow |
20 |
> the CoC, or not? Perhaps the way the black box works can be improved, |
21 |
> and maybe we can expose more of the gears inside, but what matters the |
22 |
> most is that it comes up with the right decision. |
23 |
|
24 |
If you look at the comments on my bug from 2015, no research was done. No one |
25 |
from comrel spoke to anyone I had worked with or was working with. The only |
26 |
ones I have issue with are members of comrel, mostly just a few individuals |
27 |
not the entire body. |
28 |
|
29 |
I ask anyone who has seen me conduct myself in an unprofessional manner at any |
30 |
point to say so publicly. That will be very few if any because it simply is |
31 |
not the case. |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |