| 1 |
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014, Wulf C. Krueger wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 4 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Hi Wulf. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> On 25.06.2014 19:41, Chris Reffett wrote: |
| 9 |
>>> Everyone eligible to stand has been nominated. |
| 10 |
>> I think that elections team informally decided to just list people |
| 11 |
>> who had been nominated by devs, |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> So, the elections team didn't like the rules they operate by and decided |
| 14 |
> "informally" to change them? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
No, the team didn't change any rules. |
| 17 |
I've been busy with some other stuff and so I haven't been as involved |
| 18 |
with this election as I've generally been. Unfortunately that meant more |
| 19 |
work for Chris and David. You also didn't help with your email. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
>> or who have officially accepted/declined (for the sake of |
| 22 |
>> simplicity/not having an enormous page). |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> What about those nominated who don't actively read this list and rely |
| 25 |
> on the correctness of the elections page? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I've now committed a new election page [1] that allows to address some of |
| 28 |
the issues reported and I'll be adding your entire list there. |
| 29 |
I'm currently focusing on opening the election and getting that page |
| 30 |
corrected. When I have some time, I'll add everyone missing there. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
[1] - |
| 33 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/elections/council/2014/council-201406.xml |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
> - -- |
| 36 |
> Best regards, Wulf |
| 37 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 38 |
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) |
| 39 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> iEYEARECAAYFAlOrMJ4ACgkQnuVXRcSi+5qIFgCfUxFNY14RKU0chpf/Z0vcY+a7 |
| 42 |
> SaoAnjp3+hTktup2hIYZ6igoGVTyTpKa |
| 43 |
> =pNfN |
| 44 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
> |
Archives