1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 25.06.2014 19:41, Chris Reffett wrote: |
5 |
>> Everyone eligible to stand has been nominated. |
6 |
> I think that elections team informally decided to just list people |
7 |
> who had been nominated by devs, |
8 |
|
9 |
So, the elections team didn't like the rules they operate by and decided |
10 |
"informally" to change them? |
11 |
|
12 |
> or who have officially accepted/declined (for the sake of |
13 |
> simplicity/not having an enormous page). |
14 |
|
15 |
What about those nominated who don't actively read this list and rely |
16 |
on the correctness of the elections page? |
17 |
|
18 |
- -- |
19 |
Best regards, Wulf |
20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
21 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) |
22 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
23 |
|
24 |
iEYEARECAAYFAlOrMJ4ACgkQnuVXRcSi+5qIFgCfUxFNY14RKU0chpf/Z0vcY+a7 |
25 |
SaoAnjp3+hTktup2hIYZ6igoGVTyTpKa |
26 |
=pNfN |
27 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |