Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Hiding problems, breach of Gentoo Social Contract
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 17:07:10
Message-Id: 5841AA39.9050101@iee.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Hiding problems, breach of Gentoo Social Contract by "Michał Górny"
1 On 02/12/16 08:51, Michał Górny wrote [excerpted]:
2 > That said, I don't mind publicizing comrel bugs -- if you get all
3 > the parties to agree on it. If you file a comrel bug, you do so with
4 > presumption that it will be kept classified. It's not fair to
5 > unclassify it without getting the consent of both the accusing party
6 > and the accused.
7 >
8 Please do clarify the situation where the accused is not aware of the
9 accusation, as has been the case in many recent (during 2016) complaints
10 to comrel that I have observed ... due to comrel "security" and
11 "confidentiality" concerns.
12
13 Thank you.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature