| 1 |
On 10/03/2016 11:00 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday, September 30, 2016 8:59:15 PM EDT Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> The Issue |
| 5 |
>> Recently there has been some questioning of whether we have the right |
| 6 |
>> balance of privacy in Comrel disputes. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Anonymous stats can be produced and released without releasing any private |
| 9 |
> information. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Such as but not limited to the following: |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> # of cases brought to comrel |
| 14 |
> # of cases resolved amicably |
| 15 |
> # of warnings issued |
| 16 |
> # of cases resulting in policing action, suspension, ban, etc |
| 17 |
> # of developers kicked/booted |
| 18 |
> # of developers recruited |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> For each of the above, there would be another field, # of comrel members who |
| 21 |
> voted or took part in such action. That will show if it is just individuals |
| 22 |
> having their way, or if comrel is working as a team. May even go so far as to |
| 23 |
> record votes, x number for, x number against for each. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> There could be more, but such information is very useful. All of such will |
| 26 |
> provide a measure of accountability. It does not reveal any sensitive |
| 27 |
> information. This would be like annually at minimum, monthly at maximum. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> This could even be produced retroactively so we could see if this had an |
| 30 |
> impact on the project at any given point in time. I suspect that might be the |
| 31 |
> case in the past. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
These do seem like useful stats. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |
Archives