| 1 |
On Friday, September 30, 2016 8:59:15 PM EDT Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> The Issue |
| 4 |
> Recently there has been some questioning of whether we have the right |
| 5 |
> balance of privacy in Comrel disputes. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Anonymous stats can be produced and released without releasing any private |
| 8 |
information. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Such as but not limited to the following: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
# of cases brought to comrel |
| 13 |
# of cases resolved amicably |
| 14 |
# of warnings issued |
| 15 |
# of cases resulting in policing action, suspension, ban, etc |
| 16 |
# of developers kicked/booted |
| 17 |
# of developers recruited |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
For each of the above, there would be another field, # of comrel members who |
| 20 |
voted or took part in such action. That will show if it is just individuals |
| 21 |
having their way, or if comrel is working as a team. May even go so far as to |
| 22 |
record votes, x number for, x number against for each. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
There could be more, but such information is very useful. All of such will |
| 25 |
provide a measure of accountability. It does not reveal any sensitive |
| 26 |
information. This would be like annually at minimum, monthly at maximum. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
This could even be produced retroactively so we could see if this had an |
| 29 |
impact on the project at any given point in time. I suspect that might be the |
| 30 |
case in the past. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Archives