| 1 |
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:00 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. |
| 2 |
<wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Anonymous stats can be produced and released without releasing any private |
| 5 |
> information. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Such as but not limited to the following: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> # of cases brought to comrel |
| 10 |
> # of cases resolved amicably |
| 11 |
> # of warnings issued |
| 12 |
> # of cases resulting in policing action, suspension, ban, etc |
| 13 |
> # of developers kicked/booted |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Not a bad idea. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> # of developers recruited |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Comrel doesn't recruit developers, so this is a bit meaningless. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> For each of the above, there would be another field, # of comrel members who |
| 23 |
> voted or took part in such action. That will show if it is just individuals |
| 24 |
> having their way, or if comrel is working as a team. May even go so far as to |
| 25 |
> record votes, x number for, x number against for each. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Somebody on Comrel could comment further, but I don't think they take |
| 29 |
any action without a majority vote from their members, and |
| 30 |
non-responses are effectively no votes (which might result in some |
| 31 |
decisions dragging on). So, that would mean that every action |
| 32 |
involves a majority of their membership. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
But, if this isn't the case it could also be a useful metric. My |
| 35 |
sense is that Comrel doesn't actually resolve that many cases. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Rich |
Archives