| 1 |
Hi Denis, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I'm sorry to speak publicly, but isn't this email exactly the kind of |
| 4 |
attitude we're trying to reverse. As a senior member of the project, I |
| 5 |
really would hope you set a better example of the change that you, |
| 6 |
yourself, have said you wanted to see. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
That is, unless I've completely mis-read this email, I think Rich deserves |
| 10 |
a little more charitable of a reply. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Thanks, |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Seemant |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
On 4 July 2014 11:38, Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o> wrote: |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 21 |
> > ComRel and especially Infra are less broken and thus we shouldn't be |
| 22 |
> > in as much of a rush to "fix" them. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> So, comrel and infra are less broken than QA, but they are broken. And |
| 25 |
> it's not in so much of a rush but they need to be fixed. I take it |
| 26 |
> you're going to join those two teams and help then. Judging by the |
| 27 |
> copious amount and length of your emails on our lists, it looks like |
| 28 |
> you have a lot of time on your hands. It's totally understandable |
| 29 |
> that, council being what it is, you're in need for more action. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Denis. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
Archives