| 1 |
W dniu nie, 01.04.2018 o godzinie 23∶41 -0600, użytkownik Daniel Robbins |
| 2 |
napisał: |
| 3 |
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Dean Stephens <desultory@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > As you have a stated position, specifically that this User |
| 7 |
> > Representatives proposal would resolve (largely unspecified) problems |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I think I have been clear on the problems, but I can try to be more clear. |
| 11 |
> The Council are Gentoo developers who are voted upon by Gentoo developers, |
| 12 |
> and there is no clear accountability to any outside group. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> There are severe behavioral problems on the Council right now. There is a |
| 15 |
> lack of enforcement of behavioral standards upon Council members, even |
| 16 |
> though the Council is in theory responsible for defining these standards. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I think the responses to my proposal demonstrate that the Gentoo developer |
| 19 |
> culture is isolated and protective of its own interests, not interested in |
| 20 |
> accountability (no responses saying "yes, Council members *should* indeed |
| 21 |
> be held to the same standards they hold others" -- isn't this obvious?), |
| 22 |
> and in need of reform. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
...and in the end you pretty much admit that it all boils down to 'I do |
| 26 |
not like who the developers voted for and they do not want to give me my |
| 27 |
BDFL back, so I am going to try hard to find some other way to get it'. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Best regards, |
| 31 |
Michał Górny |
Archives