| 1 |
Andreas K. Hüttel, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
If you resign from either comrel and/or council then an appeal might make |
| 4 |
sense. At this time it does not. Given the fact that you are the LEAD of |
| 5 |
comrel and also a council member. Major conflict of interest! Simply omitting |
| 6 |
from a vote is not acceptable on either body. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Which matters more to you? Being on the council or Lead of Comrel? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
As lead of Comrel you should specifically addressing the topic of any appeal. |
| 11 |
You should be able to clarify my status and what I would be appealing to |
| 12 |
council. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 8:37:34 PM EDT Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: |
| 15 |
> Am Dienstag, 11. Oktober 2016, 20:10:20 schrieb William L. Thomson Jr.: |
| 16 |
> > What would I be appealing? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> See attachment |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
That does not cover the topic of appeal. If I go to the council I need to have |
| 21 |
specifics. Not I am appealing comrel actions in general... |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Rather than refer to an attachment. It should be easier to give a statement, |
| 24 |
single sentence, as to what I would be appealing. This is a sign of your lack |
| 25 |
of leadership. Being vague when you should be specific. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Not to mention that post you refer to, you mentioned a vote from comrel. Which |
| 28 |
also seems pointless as your opinion of me is quite clear and bias. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
> . Just to document that the last two weeks haven't really led |
| 31 |
> to any significant contribution. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
What do you mean by contribution? Technical contributions? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Archives