1 |
Dnia 2015-10-04, o godz. 08:17:22 |
2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Since apparently any tiny change requires Council approval these days, |
7 |
> > here's another one... |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Trust me, we're as unhappy about this as anybody. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > Can I change the 'games' component of Bugzilla to assign bugs to |
13 |
> > bug-wranglers@ rather than games@? Otherwise, newly reported game bugs |
14 |
> > get assigned directly to games team and often are not reassigned to |
15 |
> > correct maintainers but instead are left ignored. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> ++ - in light of the decision that anybody can maintain a game apart |
18 |
> from the games team, it really doesn't make sense to have a bugzilla |
19 |
> component for games at all. They should be assigned just like any |
20 |
> other generic package. |
21 |
|
22 |
Well, that was my point but other Infra members disagree that we aren't |
23 |
allowed to change this without full Council approval. |
24 |
|
25 |
And to be honest, if I were to expand the topic, I'd rather go towards |
26 |
Bugzilla components on 'Gentoo Linux'. Because right now most of them |
27 |
don't make any sense, and are confusing to new users who don't know |
28 |
what to choose. They're pretty much all legacy, and as I see it most of |
29 |
them should be removed and bugs moved to a single common component. |
30 |
|
31 |
But that's a topic for another trollfest, I guess. |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Best regards, |
35 |
Michał Górny |
36 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |