| 1 |
El mar, 29-07-2014 a las 11:18 +0200, Ulrich Mueller escribió: |
| 2 |
> In two weeks from now, the council will meet again. This is the time |
| 3 |
> to raise and prepare items that the council should put on the agenda |
| 4 |
> to discuss or vote on. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Please respond to this message with agenda items. Do not hesitate to |
| 7 |
> repeat your agenda item here with a pointer if you previously |
| 8 |
> suggested one (since the last meeting). |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> The agenda for the next meeting will be sent out on Tuesday 2014-08-05. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Please reply to the gentoo-project list. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Ulrich |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Would like to ask for action about how to finally handle bash-completion |
| 17 |
on Gentoo. Looks like we are using a different approach as upstream to |
| 18 |
handle completions now, there was a try (one year ago) to try to switch |
| 19 |
to upstream style but seems that the revision implementing that was |
| 20 |
later dropped due some arguments. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Currently, we are blocked with old stable version as testing one neither |
| 23 |
works: |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472938 -> It explains the |
| 26 |
upstream way of handling completions. The version that implemented it |
| 27 |
was 2.1-r1, it was later removed by Samuli (that did most of the work) |
| 28 |
as looks like others complained. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486306 -> this shows how current |
| 31 |
2.1 version is the tree has some problems blocking its stabilization |
| 32 |
until a decision is made finally |
Archives