Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] List of features proposed for EAPI 5
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:02:20
Message-Id: 20551.49561.741035.866989@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] List of features proposed for EAPI 5 (was: Council meeting: Tuesday 11 September 2012, 19:00 UTC) by Fabian Groffen
1 >>>>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Fabian Groffen wrote:
2
3 >> * Slot operator dependencies
4 >> PMS wording: <http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/pms.git;a=commit;h=f9f7729c047300e1924ad768a49c660e12c2f906>
5 >> Portage patch: <http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=e4ba8f36e6a4624f4fec61c7ce8bed0e3bd2fa01>
6 >> Bug: <https://bugs.gentoo.org/229521>
7
8 > The Portage patch doesn't match the PMS patch or the bug report. The
9 > Portage patch refers to slot_abi, not slot operator dependencies.
10
11 > While Bug and PMS wording seem to be included in the Portage patch,
12 > the Portage patch appears to do much more, overloading SLOT with
13 > some ABI information, which Bug and PMS do NOT mention.
14
15 To clarify, the Portage patch links of "slot operator dependencies"
16 and "sub-slots" point to the same Git commit. Both features are
17 implemented and available in EAPI 5_pre1.
18
19 Ulrich