Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2021-01-10 (late call, meeting this week!)
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:56:44
Message-Id: X/xnJrgJkfVK21a1@samurai
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2021-01-10 (late call, meeting this week!) by David Seifert
1 On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 01:41:05PM +0100, David Seifert wrote:
2 > On Sun, 2021-01-10 at 23:57 -0500, desultory wrote:
3 > >
4 > > So, just to be clear, you are pushing a suggestion which received much
5 > > more negative feedback than positive and which you avoid following
6 > > whenever possible?
7 >
8 > Kinda odd then that it was accepted by the council unanimously, don't
9 > you think?
10 >
11 >
12
13 The acceptance by the council is irrelevant to desultory's reply here.
14
15 Oddly, I agree with desultory's response and implication here.
16
17 Of course, like any rule/regulation/suggestion/CoC, we are all guilty at
18 one time or another of violating it.
19
20 -Aaron

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies