1 |
On 2011-02-16 20:41, Angelo Arrifano wrote: |
2 |
> [1] http://dev.gentoo.org/~miknix/about.xml |
3 |
|
4 |
Minor notes: |
5 |
"We only patch applications" -> "Generally, we only patch applications" |
6 |
|
7 |
"as least as possible" -> "as little as possible" |
8 |
|
9 |
"run Gentoo as primary system" -> "run Gentoo as your primary operating |
10 |
system" |
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
The wording in "Stable or bleeding-edge" could use some improvement and |
14 |
clarification. |
15 |
|
16 |
"(i.e. up-to-date packages)" should probably be something along "(i.e. |
17 |
they are (rather|decently) up-to-date)". |
18 |
|
19 |
Going into which files to edit to make use of stable/unstable mixing |
20 |
is probably too specific here. Mension that it only involves editing a |
21 |
file to accomplish, but don't go into which files those are. |
22 |
|
23 |
"faster" in this context seems weird... "earlier" fits better. |
24 |
|
25 |
I think "unstable" here gives the wrong impression. The software that |
26 |
portage installs really shouldn't be "unstable". Marking a package as |
27 |
~arch is for testing the _ebuild_, not the package. So I'd probably |
28 |
re-write this to something along: |
29 |
|
30 |
"Our stable packages generally stay close to upstream (i.e. they are |
31 |
decently up-to-date). However, if you find that the "stable" version of |
32 |
your favorite software is too far behind upstream you can get the latest |
33 |
version by mixing "stable" and "testing" packages, simply by editing a |
34 |
file or two of portage's config. That way you don't compromise the |
35 |
stability of your entire system by wanting the latest of one particular |
36 |
application." |
37 |
|
38 |
> "At one point we all were new to Gentoo and learned about it, now it |
39 |
> is your turn" |
40 |
|
41 |
Maybe something like this instead?: |
42 |
"All of its current users had to learn to harness the power of Gentoo. |
43 |
Are you ready to take control?" |
44 |
|
45 |
More like a dare, makes for a more interesting finish... |