Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-project <gentoo-project@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Discontinuing the support for GitHub pull requests
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 13:33:14
Message-Id: CAGfcS_nwUSfEdX6EKEhz3Qr_R9o=TrCRR8Xxa+dGQcTzpZ+WvQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Discontinuing the support for GitHub pull requests by "Michał Górny"
1 On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > So what's your alternative? Put a big 'feel free to file a pull request
4 > and it might be reviewed, rejected straight away or ignored for months.
5 > You may want to also file a bug with the same content just in case'?
6 >
7
8 The same basically applies to bugzilla. Bugs taking months to get
9 resolved is fairly common if they aren't highly impactful, and
10 sometimes even if they are.
11
12 I checked and I don't have any assigned PRs, but if I did I know I'd
13 be annoyed if somebody went around closing them if they weren't
14 actually resolved, just as I would be if somebody did the same in
15 bugzilla.
16
17 I'm going to try to refrain from going back and forth on this more,
18 but I'd suggest stepping back a bit on this. IMO the ability to use
19 github as a tool for managing PR is useful, and even if it isn't used
20 universally it is better to keep it around.
21
22 Sure, github is optional, but when you think about it so is bugzilla.
23 There is no Gentoo bug service level agreement. If a package
24 maintainer is ignoring bugs the solution is for somebody else to step
25 up to help maintain the package.
26
27 --
28 Rich