Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
To: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Cc: "gentoo-project@l.g.o" <gentoo-project@l.g.o>, Gentoo Council <council@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-10-11
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 21:51:49
Message-Id: 201510012353.03971.dilfridge@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-10-11 by "Michał Górny"
1 Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 22:39:14 schrieb Michał Górny:
2 >
3 > > > > * Obviously there are exceptions to this rigid structure for few
4 > > > > special teams (sec, infra, ...)
5 > > >
6 > > > Doesn't this kill the whole idea? Or are we talking about projects
7 > > > which are not allowed to maintain packages?
8 > >
9 > > What's maintaining packages got to do with the generation the mail
10 > > aliases?
11 >
12 > Well, you just said you want to have team names matching e-mail
13 > addresses. If you add exceptions, that's no longer true. But if they
14 > don't maintain any packages, this won't bite us during bug assignment.
15
16 I dont think we really need exceptions for the mail adresses. More for the
17 automatic alias management.
18
19 --
20 Andreas K. Huettel
21 Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)
22 dilfridge@g.o
23 http://www.akhuettel.de/