| 1 |
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Daniel Robbins <drobbins@××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> "This social contract is intended to clearly describe the overall |
| 4 |
> development policies and standards of the Gentoo project development team. |
| 5 |
> Potential improvements to the social contract should be submitted to the |
| 6 |
> Gentoo Linux bug tracker at https://bugs.gentoo.org, and assigned to |
| 7 |
> gentoo-trustees. Specific questions about social contract, and discussion |
| 8 |
> about potential future improvements can be posted to the gentoo-project |
| 9 |
> mailing list." |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Wouldn't it make sense to have these assigned to the council? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
GLEP 39 states that "Global issues will be decided by an elected |
| 15 |
Gentoo Council." Surely the social contract is a global issue, and I |
| 16 |
don't see any exception in GLEP 39 pertaining to the social contract |
| 17 |
specifically. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
(Apologies for the repost, but it looks like the thread was split |
| 20 |
shortly after I sent the former one.) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Rich |
Archives