| 1 |
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, at 11:25 CDT, R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> For anyone interested, here is a fairly comprehensive comparison of |
| 4 |
> self hosting options: https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/comparison/ |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> It is likely gitea is the best. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Cheers, |
| 9 |
> R0b0t1 |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, at 09:56 CDT, Francesco Riosa <vivo75@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> In case the need arise, I'm offering to host a 3rd party git |
| 15 |
> infrastructure, storage and cpu power are available, what it's needed is |
| 16 |
> an in depth analysis of how it should be built. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> To avoid adding load to infra jobs this should be a totally external |
| 19 |
> project, this also mean there will be no real benefit comparing it to |
| 20 |
> current github usage, i.e. all the "pull requests" will need to be |
| 21 |
> managed by gentoo developers which will have some kind of access to the |
| 22 |
> server. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Let me know if there is interest |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Francesco Riosa |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
To answer your two e-mails: |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
We host our critical development infrastructure (including gitolite, |
| 33 |
master mirror, etc.) exclusively on our own servers under our control. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
The mirror we provide on github is merely a convenience tool - we do |
| 36 |
this because we want to enable github users an easy path for sharing |
| 37 |
contributions (i.e. pull requests). The point here is that we chose |
| 38 |
github because of its 30 million users (and the fact that nearly |
| 39 |
everyone who potentially contributes already has a github account). |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Talking about alternatives is completely missing the mark. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Best, |
| 44 |
Matthias |
Archives