1 |
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:13:30 -0400 |
2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> I think there are other arguments to be made against anonymity. |
5 |
|
6 |
Pseudonymity is hardly anything like anonymity. |
7 |
|
8 |
Creating a pseudonym requires much work, and its a constructed |
9 |
"persona" that is a public representation of your natural person. |
10 |
|
11 |
Just like a real person, a pseudonym requires establishing networks of |
12 |
trust between peers. |
13 |
|
14 |
And you don't need to know my physical identity in order for me to |
15 |
prove, when you meet me, that my physical identity is the owner of the |
16 |
pseudonym. |
17 |
|
18 |
If pseudonymity is forbidden, significant contributors of opensource |
19 |
projects would have to cease existing, among, but not limited to: |
20 |
|
21 |
_why of Ruby ( who disappeared entirely from opensource when people |
22 |
started leaking his true name ) |
23 |
|
24 |
Chromatic ( The author of the Modern Perl book, who has respectable |
25 |
involvement in both Perl5 and Perl6 ) |
26 |
|
27 |
Its all good to talk about "openness", but forbidding pseudonymity on |
28 |
this basis is nearly forbidding privacy, because you're tempting that |
29 |
whole "why do you need privacy if you've got nothing to hide" mentality. |
30 |
|
31 |
Lets say for example you have a job, and your employer is a dick who |
32 |
doesn't understand how software works, and will make your life unduely |
33 |
miserable if they find you out in the real world contributing to |
34 |
opensource in your free time, despite having no legal right to |
35 |
persecute you as such. |
36 |
|
37 |
You're not doing anything untoward, but your employer's braindead |
38 |
mentality conspires with this policies braindead mentality to forbid |
39 |
you from contributing for no good reason. |
40 |
|
41 |
Your options become "quit your job" or "quit contributing". |
42 |
|
43 |
And you're not actually achieving any real "openness" as a result of |
44 |
this insanity, you're just making the lives of people who have |
45 |
legitimate grounds for pseudonymity, harder. |
46 |
|
47 |
And have people forgotten 'doxxing' is a thing? And in some cases |
48 |
having your real identity out there in the real world simply serves as |
49 |
a vector for undue harassment? Even if everything you do is above |
50 |
board, that doesn't stop busy-bodies deciding you're conflicting with |
51 |
their distorted sense of morality and using that as grounds to |
52 |
persecute you. |
53 |
|
54 |
Say for example you present opinions in favour of something that is not |
55 |
politically popular where you live ( say you're a gay rights activist, |
56 |
but live in russia ). You're known by the same pseudonym all over |
57 |
opensource, but your real name is not published. |
58 |
|
59 |
And then, this policy comes around, and you have a choice: either keep |
60 |
using a pseudonym, or tempt associating that pseudonym with your real |
61 |
self, which potentially invites significant negative social |
62 |
consequences. |
63 |
|
64 |
I don't think these sorts of "expose yourself to the elements for all |
65 |
to attack" behaviours are something Gentoo should be encouraging under |
66 |
the banner of openness. |