Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Michael Everitt <m.j.everitt@×××.org>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Questions for Gentoo Council nominees: Gentoo Foundation
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 22:15:31
Message-Id: 511eea50-fb16-53ad-b434-728eb66e98db@iee.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Questions for Gentoo Council nominees: Gentoo Foundation by Kristian Fiskerstrand
1 On 26/06/19 23:03, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
2 > On 6/26/19 11:54 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
3 >> On 19-06-26 21:45:48, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
4 >>> On 6/25/19 1:23 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
5 >>>> To the Council nominees, I put forward the following questions, around
6 >>>> the Gentoo Foundation:
7 >>>>
8 >>>> 1. What's your opinion of the past relationship between the Council &
9 >>>> Foundation?
10 >>> The council has been critical of the way the foundation has been run,
11 >>> for good reasons.
12 >>>
13 >> Do you mind enumerating the reasons and the actions you wish to see
14 >> taken?
15 > The foundation has failed to run an operation in accordance with the
16 > laws and legislation of a foundation when it comes to, in particular,
17 > accounting matters of a number of years, which is a disgrace. The
18 > primary responsibility of the board of directors and its officers is to
19 > ensure that the foundation comply with applicable laws and file the
20 > necessary paperwork for its operation for things including tax matters.
21 >
22 Isn't it about time we quit pinning the mistakes of the past on the
23 officers of the present? From what I understand, the present and recent
24 officers have made extraordinary efforts to rectify the shortcomings of
25 previous trustees, and to bang on about the status quo and that of previous
26 foundation officers is hardly either constructive nor helpful to rectifying
27 the present situation.
28 >>>> 2. What should the future relationship between the Council & Foundation
29 >>>> look like?
30 >>> As long as the foundation does it job and doesn't meddle in the running
31 >>> of the distro I'm fine, but the foundation is there to support the distro.
32 >>>
33 >>>> 3. What should the future of the Foundation itself look like?
34 >>> I'm fond of having an own foundation rather than an umbrella org, but it
35 >>> requires that it is properly run.
36 >>>
37 >> Do you mind being more specific here as well?
38 > see above.
39 >
40 >

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies