| 1 |
On 2013.05.24 12:46, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello guys, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> after last bunch of mails and internal complains I decided it is time |
| 5 |
> to do |
| 6 |
> something proactive. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> So I give you revised Gentoo Code of Conduct. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
[snip] |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Cheers |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Tom |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Tom, |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I would delete everything from "Examples of inappropriate behavior" to |
| 20 |
the credits at the end. Escalation, punishment and appeal is already |
| 21 |
covered by devrel documentation. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
This will avoid the, "Well, its not listed so its ok" reaction. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
If you want to say anything about enforcement in the CoC remind readers |
| 26 |
that everyone is responsible for enforcement. Its key to defusing the |
| 27 |
situations covered by the CoC that a reminder is delivered very |
| 28 |
quickly. That's in part why the Proctors project failed ... the |
| 29 |
elapsed time between an incident arising and a response. Even a few |
| 30 |
hours is too long. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Regards, |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Roy Bamford |
| 36 |
(Neddyseagoon) a member of |
| 37 |
elections |
| 38 |
gentoo-ops |
| 39 |
forum-mods |
| 40 |
trustees |
Archives