Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Matthew Thode <prometheanfire@g.o>
To: NP-Hardass <NP-Hardass@g.o>, gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Comrel Improvements: Expectations of Privacy
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 04:59:34
Message-Id: 32572b94-603c-67aa-a477-6553b129df87@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Comrel Improvements: Expectations of Privacy by NP-Hardass
1 On 10/03/2016 11:55 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
2 > On 10/04/2016 12:32 AM, Matthew Thode wrote:
3 >> Just had a thought related to this that should probably be talked about.
4 >>
5 >> Why doesn't wilikins log all chat and post it online? I'll probably be
6 >> stating this a few times, but openstack does it and it works. It may
7 >> also help for 'evidence' gathering, at least for public channels. It
8 >> was suggested that #gentoo-chat shouldn't be logged because of stupid
9 >> stuff that goes on there, but I'd rather it be cleaned up than not
10 >> logged personally.
11 >>
12 >
13 > While I see a benefit to the proposal, I'm not sure that it addresses
14 > the problem. In my recent experiences, when there is an issue publicly,
15 > there are usually enough corroborating witnesses. Doesn't help with
16 > PMs, which are pervasive. There are certain situations, where I agree
17 > we could benefit from logging, IMO, it is far from a comprehensive
18 > solution. If we did have a system for public logging, it'd be worth
19 > considering the merits of opt-in vs opt-out vs mandatory logging as well
20 > as whether the logs should be search engine indexable.
21 >
22
23 I realize it's not perfect, but it's a step in the right direction.
24 Also, I'd prefer if they are fully public and indexable. A bunch of
25 good info is only in irc sometimes :P
26
27 --
28 -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Comrel Improvements: Expectations of Privacy Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>