1 |
On 10/03/2016 11:55 PM, NP-Hardass wrote: |
2 |
> On 10/04/2016 12:32 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: |
3 |
>> Just had a thought related to this that should probably be talked about. |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> Why doesn't wilikins log all chat and post it online? I'll probably be |
6 |
>> stating this a few times, but openstack does it and it works. It may |
7 |
>> also help for 'evidence' gathering, at least for public channels. It |
8 |
>> was suggested that #gentoo-chat shouldn't be logged because of stupid |
9 |
>> stuff that goes on there, but I'd rather it be cleaned up than not |
10 |
>> logged personally. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> While I see a benefit to the proposal, I'm not sure that it addresses |
14 |
> the problem. In my recent experiences, when there is an issue publicly, |
15 |
> there are usually enough corroborating witnesses. Doesn't help with |
16 |
> PMs, which are pervasive. There are certain situations, where I agree |
17 |
> we could benefit from logging, IMO, it is far from a comprehensive |
18 |
> solution. If we did have a system for public logging, it'd be worth |
19 |
> considering the merits of opt-in vs opt-out vs mandatory logging as well |
20 |
> as whether the logs should be search engine indexable. |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
I realize it's not perfect, but it's a step in the right direction. |
24 |
Also, I'd prefer if they are fully public and indexable. A bunch of |
25 |
good info is only in irc sometimes :P |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |