| 1 |
On 10/04/2016 12:32 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: |
| 2 |
> Just had a thought related to this that should probably be talked about. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Why doesn't wilikins log all chat and post it online? I'll probably be |
| 5 |
> stating this a few times, but openstack does it and it works. It may |
| 6 |
> also help for 'evidence' gathering, at least for public channels. It |
| 7 |
> was suggested that #gentoo-chat shouldn't be logged because of stupid |
| 8 |
> stuff that goes on there, but I'd rather it be cleaned up than not |
| 9 |
> logged personally. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
While I see a benefit to the proposal, I'm not sure that it addresses |
| 13 |
the problem. In my recent experiences, when there is an issue publicly, |
| 14 |
there are usually enough corroborating witnesses. Doesn't help with |
| 15 |
PMs, which are pervasive. There are certain situations, where I agree |
| 16 |
we could benefit from logging, IMO, it is far from a comprehensive |
| 17 |
solution. If we did have a system for public logging, it'd be worth |
| 18 |
considering the merits of opt-in vs opt-out vs mandatory logging as well |
| 19 |
as whether the logs should be search engine indexable. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
NP-Hardass |
Archives