1 |
On Sat, 2019-07-13 at 23:38 +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I'm trying to put together a survey about the Nitrokey units that the |
5 |
> Foundation arranged for devs. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> The rough goals: |
8 |
> - measure shipping results [=> quantitative, at least one dev had their shipment returned] |
9 |
> - measure usage [=> quantitative, was this a waste?] |
10 |
> - measure satisfaction with nitrokey units [=> qualitative] |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I'm planning on using Google Forms for this, because I'm familiar with |
13 |
> that as a survey platform. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I'm not going to spin up an entire survey system just keep it entirely |
16 |
> libre. I do plan on publishing the results of the survey, with some |
17 |
> parts made anonymous/redacted. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> The form will NOT require sign-in, but there will be a field for |
20 |
> entering your developer name. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> I would appreciate both public & private input, both about this as a |
23 |
> survey, and meta-input about future surveys to measure success of |
24 |
> particular programs. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Draft questions: |
27 |
> ---------------- |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Setup: |
30 |
> - Dev Username [textfield] |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Shipping: |
33 |
> - Did you order a nitrokey unit? boolean |
34 |
> - When did you placed the order (optional) Y/M/D |
35 |
|
36 |
'place', and ISO8601, please. |
37 |
|
38 |
> - When did you received the order (optional) Y/M/D |
39 |
|
40 |
Likewise. |
41 |
|
42 |
> - How many nitrokey units did you actually receive? [integer] |
43 |
> - Did you have to pay any additional charges to receive the unit? |
44 |
> - If so, how much did you pay? [numeric] |
45 |
> COMMENT: I want to be able to adjust this question to both per-country |
46 |
> cost-of-living and socioeconomic level of different developers within |
47 |
> a country. See the demographics at the end. |
48 |
> - If so, what were the nature of the charges (e.g. customs) [freetext] |
49 |
> - Additional: If you did not receive the order, or got more than one, |
50 |
> can you summarize what happened? [freetext] Please do not |
51 |
> self-identify in the text. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> Usage: |
54 |
> - Note: per-developer commit count will be extracted from Git |
55 |
> - What percentage of your commits use the on-device key? (0..100% in 25% increments) |
56 |
> - Did you use the units for non-commit signing or encryption? [boolean] |
57 |
> - If so, how often? [many times a day, daily, weekly, monthly] |
58 |
> |
59 |
> Satisfaction: |
60 |
> - What setup tooling documentation did you use: [select-many] |
61 |
> - Gentoo wiki |
62 |
> - Nitrokey docs |
63 |
> - Other doc (freetext) |
64 |
> - Figured it out by hacking it |
65 |
> - Did you find the setup tooling easy to use? [1-5 scale] |
66 |
> - Do you find regular usage of the tooling & unit easy? [1-5 scale] |
67 |
> - Does the tooling & unit work consistently? [1-5 scale] |
68 |
|
69 |
I don't really understand what 'consistently' means here. |
70 |
|
71 |
> - Would you have considered purchasing a Nitrokey if the Foundation did |
72 |
> not fund it, and cost was not a problem? [1-5 scale] |
73 |
> - If you encountered problems, can you summarize some of them? |
74 |
> [freetext] Please do not self-identify in the text |
75 |
> - What do you feel could have been done better? |
76 |
> [freetext] Please do not self-identify in the text |
77 |
|
78 |
You may want to clarify if that relates specifically to Gentoo usage of |
79 |
Nitrokey, or should include generic remarks about it. |
80 |
|
81 |
> |
82 |
> Demographics, all optional: |
83 |
> - Where are you located: [textfield, ISO country code] |
84 |
> - Age bracket [0-17, 18-25, 25-35, 35-45, 45-55, 55-65, 65+] |
85 |
> - For your country, what is your household income level, relative to the |
86 |
> median income? [select-one] |
87 |
> - Decline to answer |
88 |
> - Significantly below [<=50% below] |
89 |
> - Below [20-50% below] |
90 |
> - About the same [20% either side of median] |
91 |
> - Above [20-50% above] |
92 |
> - Significantly above [>=50% above] |
93 |
> COMMENT: This is specifically to identify need where developers |
94 |
> would have trouble purchasing hardware. The complex wording of the |
95 |
> question is meant to improve anonymity while identifying socioeconomic |
96 |
> need. |
97 |
> |
98 |
|
99 |
-- |
100 |
Best regards, |
101 |
Michał Górny |