| 1 |
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Ian Delaney <idella4@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 17:48:38 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> Aside to those, I find the whole text hard to comprehend. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Happily the others who proof read it didn't. |
| 10 |
> The above have been entered. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
The essence of the quandary, for which it is of the utmost importance |
| 14 |
for the whole of the body politic which is Gentoo to be obliged to |
| 15 |
Michał for alluding, is that in the place where an incomplex |
| 16 |
vernacular might have prevailed, we find, as an unappetizing |
| 17 |
substitute, a conglomerate of labyrinthine phraseology. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
The correctness of such a work might be judged legitimate vis a vis |
| 20 |
the Oxford Dictionary of English Grammar. Nevertheless it is entirely |
| 21 |
within the realm of comprehensibility that a naive reader could find |
| 22 |
it beyond such. We ought to, and indeed the man possessing of even |
| 23 |
simple virtue will, empathize with those who should find that such |
| 24 |
matters are not endemic. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Perhaps a few of us can spend a few minutes simplifying it. As a |
| 27 |
bonus, you might also read the above and find as many examples of |
| 28 |
amphibology as you can. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I do apologize for having a bit of jest at your expense though - |
| 31 |
thanks for stepping up! This being a wiki, it is fair for those with |
| 32 |
complaints to step up and help out rather than merely criticizing. :) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Rich |
Archives