From: | Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: separate /usr preparation vote | ||
Date: | Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:30:15 | ||
Message-Id: | 521CFE54.60301@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: separate /usr preparation vote by Roy Bamford |
1 | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 | Hash: SHA256 |
3 | |
4 | On 27/08/13 03:11 PM, Roy Bamford wrote: |
5 | > On 2013.08.17 23:20, William Hubbs wrote: |
6 | >> Council members, |
7 | >> |
8 | >> After looking over the documentation I know about [1] [2] [3], I |
9 | >> think it is safe to Say we are prepared to move forward with |
10 | >> stating that the preparations for early boot mechanisms are |
11 | >> complete. |
12 | > |
13 | > [snip] |
14 | > |
15 | >> Thanks, |
16 | >> |
17 | >> William |
18 | >> |
19 | >> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/initramfs-guide.xml [2] |
20 | >> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-x86+raid+lvm2- |
21 | >> quickinstall.xml [3] |
22 | >> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Early_Userspace_Mounting [4] |
23 | >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481202 |
24 | >> |
25 | > |
26 | > William, |
27 | > |
28 | > If such a vote were to go in your favour, what are the next steps |
29 | > and the timescale(s) for these steps? |
30 | > |
31 | > You clearly perceive the vote you seek as endorsing a plan of |
32 | > action relating to the /usr merge. |
33 | > |
34 | > My apologies in advance if I have missed these details. |
35 | > |
36 | > |
37 | |
38 | Also #4 is still blocked, that to me would seem that we are not ready. |
39 | |
40 | |
41 | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
42 | Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
43 | |
44 | iF4EAREIAAYFAlIc/lQACgkQ2ugaI38ACPBDfgD/WCiLFNWFyS8aWZ963/FtKlxL |
45 | SmsyE7YcorfDTIL7C0sA+wURmTE1LV337zrEl50crDixe5rWbguwKMqLtxpKnHY4 |
46 | =oAx3 |
47 | -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: separate /usr preparation vote | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |