Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: separate /usr preparation vote
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:30:15
Message-Id: 521CFE54.60301@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: separate /usr preparation vote by Roy Bamford
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 27/08/13 03:11 PM, Roy Bamford wrote:
5 > On 2013.08.17 23:20, William Hubbs wrote:
6 >> Council members,
7 >>
8 >> After looking over the documentation I know about [1] [2] [3], I
9 >> think it is safe to Say we are prepared to move forward with
10 >> stating that the preparations for early boot mechanisms are
11 >> complete.
12 >
13 > [snip]
14 >
15 >> Thanks,
16 >>
17 >> William
18 >>
19 >> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/initramfs-guide.xml [2]
20 >> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-x86+raid+lvm2-
21 >> quickinstall.xml [3]
22 >> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Early_Userspace_Mounting [4]
23 >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481202
24 >>
25 >
26 > William,
27 >
28 > If such a vote were to go in your favour, what are the next steps
29 > and the timescale(s) for these steps?
30 >
31 > You clearly perceive the vote you seek as endorsing a plan of
32 > action relating to the /usr merge.
33 >
34 > My apologies in advance if I have missed these details.
35 >
36 >
37
38 Also #4 is still blocked, that to me would seem that we are not ready.
39
40
41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
42 Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
43
44 iF4EAREIAAYFAlIc/lQACgkQ2ugaI38ACPBDfgD/WCiLFNWFyS8aWZ963/FtKlxL
45 SmsyE7YcorfDTIL7C0sA+wURmTE1LV337zrEl50crDixe5rWbguwKMqLtxpKnHY4
46 =oAx3
47 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: separate /usr preparation vote Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>