Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 00:58:22
Message-Id: assp.01256e516d.19751888.OiNUUi794h@wlt
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Representation of Gentoo on third-party platforms by Rich Freeman
1 On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 5:41:45 PM EST Rich Freeman wrote:
2 >
3 > However, it is probably worth noting that in the two cases that seem
4 > to have stirred up the pot, the Council DID exercise direct oversight
5 > on one of them,
6
7 What was the outcome?
8
9 > and in the other the person impacted has stated on the
10 > list that they do not believe that the Council would reverse the
11 > Comrel decisions, though they have not actually appealed.
12
13 What happens after appeal?
14 What happens if an appeal is successful?
15 Will there be animosity from Comrel if their decision is overturned?
16 Is comrel restricted from taking an further action against said individual?
17 Would people in Comrel be punished and face their own Comrel action for
18 breaching Comrel policies?
19
20 Simply saying appeal to council shows a lack of thinking out the entire
21 process after the fact. Also shows a lack of understand of the potential crap
22 storm this could potentially create.
23
24 Gentoo has enough problems. By all means lets create more, and waste more time
25 on non-technical matters. Because we all have tons of free time to spare for
26 such...
27
28 --
29 William L. Thomson Jr.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies