| 1 |
Pacho, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On 25-09-2012 21:32:50 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 4 |
> This is from: |
| 5 |
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/260662 |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> But corrected to remember preferred usage of in_iuse from eutils.eclass |
| 8 |
> as remembered by mgorny in that thread: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I've considered your point, but concluded that at this moment, the |
| 11 |
Council basically has nothing to do here. It seems obvious that it |
| 12 |
needs something to be defined in a next EAPI, but the Council is not the |
| 13 |
body to invent that. |
| 14 |
Please discuss with involved people (Portage devs?) and prepare a patch |
| 15 |
to PMS that can be used as feature for the next EAPI. Brian's |
| 16 |
IUSE_FLATTENED might be a simple and good solution for that. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Best, |
| 19 |
Fabian |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 23 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives