1 |
El mar, 02-10-2012 a las 13:30 +0200, Fabian Groffen escribió: |
2 |
> Pacho, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On 25-09-2012 21:32:50 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
5 |
> > This is from: |
6 |
> > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/260662 |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > But corrected to remember preferred usage of in_iuse from eutils.eclass |
9 |
> > as remembered by mgorny in that thread: |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I've considered your point, but concluded that at this moment, the |
12 |
> Council basically has nothing to do here. It seems obvious that it |
13 |
> needs something to be defined in a next EAPI, but the Council is not the |
14 |
> body to invent that. |
15 |
> Please discuss with involved people (Portage devs?) and prepare a patch |
16 |
> to PMS that can be used as feature for the next EAPI. Brian's |
17 |
> IUSE_FLATTENED might be a simple and good solution for that. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Best, |
20 |
> Fabian |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
And what about current usage in the tree with current eapis? Regarding |
24 |
IUSE_FLATTENED I have no problem with it, but will need to talk with |
25 |
portage team also as they have the current implementation |