| 1 |
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Chris Reffett <creffett@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> You've completely misrepresented Rich's position here. He was saying that |
| 5 |
> he isn't aware of software organizations which give their users a direct |
| 6 |
> and formal part of the decision-making process (that is, a vote), and you |
| 7 |
> turned that around and accused him of saying that software organizations |
| 8 |
> don't solicit user feedback. Those are two completely separate things -- |
| 9 |
> user feedback drives software development, certainly, but that's not the |
| 10 |
> same as giving users a direct vote on the development process. Users can |
| 11 |
> submit all the feedback they want, and it's obviously beneficial to listen |
| 12 |
> to them, but in the end, it's the company(/organization/whatever) that |
| 13 |
> decides what to work on. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
You clearly haven't read my proposal, which does not involve giving users |
| 17 |
direct involvement in the decision-making process. You and Rich need to |
| 18 |
actually read my proposal. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-Daniel |
Archives